Talk:Growth

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 November 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep as disambiguation page.

Untitled

I sometimes scan for articles titles I think are important to see how much is written on them. I have never found such an important topic with so little written. Please put this on your list.

Jeeb 19:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

-- Enochlau 09:33, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Biological growth

I think this page needs more detail on biological growth.

Not sure how best to do it as lots of pages link here already. Disambiguation page? New page "biological growth". Redirect all existing links?

I also suggest a page be created on biological growth of animals in general. See for example fr:Biological growth. Deco 23:07, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Down growth

Everybody speaks about down growth in economy. What about "down growth"? Is that a negative exponential development? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.53.247.239 (talk) 10:04, 29 October

helllllllo growth!

growth is important — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.245.211 (talk) 09:42, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is right, as are other users going back to 2005: it is utterly extraordinary that there isn't an article called Growth. What we're doing with nothing better than this lamentable dab page, I don't know. It's a major topic; take a look at On Growth and Form for one scientist's take on the subject, and it's from a century ago. Wot, no article? — Ridiculous! Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]