Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrasian
Chrasian was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE
Dictdef of a slang term which gets zero Google hits. RickK 06:53, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
- delete jericho4.0 07:20, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Neologism, Delete -- Ferkelparade π 07:20, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, apparently a neologism or a joke. Sietse 07:23, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Joke that isn't funny. Geogre 13:52, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, yes it is a real term!
- This term should stay, as it is very real and well-used in Washington State. Please don't suggest it for deletion as it is colloquial and as such, can not be reasonably judged by those outside of the state. It would be tantamount to a 1996 New Yorker saying that hella is not a real term.
- Neologisms do not belong here, unless there's a suitably-detailed concept behind them and widespread use can be shown. Delete. Inky 03:06, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- I'm from Washington State and I've seen it in a local print paper before... keep wurkir 10:10 pm, 29 Oct. 2004
- OK, now that you've been told that anons can't vote, you've created an account. Well, sorry, people whose accounts didn't exist before the nomination don't get counted either. This is this user's first edit. RickK 05:31, Oct 30, 2004 (UTC)
- Jesus, Rick, I've been a contributor to Wikipedia for some time and it never occured to me to make an account until now. (since an account isn't necessary at all) And I did see it in print in a local community college paper... btw, one of those anons is a friend vouching for it, as he saw the article as well.
- Find it online somewhere. Google has zero hits. RickK 22:21, Oct 30, 2004 (UTC)
- OK, now that you've been told that anons can't vote, you've created an account. Well, sorry, people whose accounts didn't exist before the nomination don't get counted either. This is this user's first edit. RickK 05:31, Oct 30, 2004 (UTC)
- This doesn't have any potential of yeilding an encyclopedic article, and is not truly verifiable, so it must be deleted. —siroχo
- Delete unverifiable slangdef. -- Cyrius|✎ 04:44, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.