Jump to content

Talk:2002 Winter Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New article name standard

[edit]

I moved this article to the common Olympic names format "(Year) (Season) Olympics", but I haven't moved the subpages, because I want them to become real pages, not subpages. As I do not yet have a suitable name that I like, I'll do this when I've found one. Jeronimo 04:20 Aug 5, 2002 (PDT)

Breakup into subpages

[edit]

(moved from Talk:2002 Winter Olympic Games)

Is it necessary to break this up into sub-pages? The Games are an event of pre-determined duration with a finite set of medal winners that are best viewed on a single page. ---User:Eclecticology

The reason to break it up into subpages is because the single page was getting much too long. What makes it "best viewed on a single page"? It makes sense to have a summary count on the front page, but at least to me having several windowlengths of information doesn't best give the information. --The Cunctator

Extreme sports US-centered?

[edit]

(moved from Talk:2002 Winter Olympic Games)

This was removed as being "US-centered":

A feature of this Olympics has been the emergence of the so-called "extreme" sports, such as snowboarding, moguls and aerials, which appeared in previous Olympics but have captured public attention this year as never before.

I restored it. It seems true to me that these sports, which are relatively new to the Olympics, are receiving more attention than they did four years ago. (I'm not particularly a fan of these sports; it just seems to me that it's an appropriate observation.) If someone could explain why this is a "US-centered" remark, please do. -- User:RjLesch

I don't know about it being US-centric, but how has it captured the public's attention as never before?--branko
More people participate in these sports than before--particularly snowboarding. Funnyhat 22:26, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

NSSE

[edit]

"The Office of Homeland Security (OHS) designated the Olympics a National Special Security Event (NSSE), which made the United States Secret Service in charge of security."

This statement is in factual contradiction with statements at National Special Security Event, where it's indicated that the United States SS is responsible only for coordinating the tasks of federal agencies. I don't know which is correct.

The statement was on the first one. The Secret Service was in charge of security. -- SNIyer12, (talk), 03:57 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Slogan

[edit]

I think we should put the slogan of the games in> "Light the Fire Within" tdwuhs

Outrageous!

[edit]

Who the idiot had forgotten Samppa Lajunen's achievements?

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on 2002 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Speech

[edit]

The Utah Alcohol Laws section is written as if someone is clearly opposed to the laws in Utah. This shouldn't sound biased. - 144.35.240.140 (talk) 18:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]