Jump to content

Talk:Yuri I of Galicia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inconsistency regarding death date

[edit]

This article gives its subject's death date as 18 March 1308. The Wikipedia article about his second wife, Euphemia of Kuyavia, gives her death date as 18 March 1308, and says "The only preserved evidence of Euphemia's existence is from Jan Długosz's Yearbooks, which reported that on March 18, 1308 Euphemia died and she was the daughter of Prince Casimir and the wife of Yuri I, who died in the same year on April 21, which was also his birthday." If Długosz's annals are in fact the closest thing to a primary source for Yuri of Galicia's death date, sure this article should be amended to show that date as April 21, 1308, rather than 18 March.pnh (talk) 07:36, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

from VfD

[edit]

On 15 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jurij I of Halicz for a record of the discussion.

material

[edit]

I have been using some of materials published at [1] and its sister pages.

This monarch was in such a western position compared to other "Russian" rulers that Georg, Gyorgy, Georgius, Jiri, Jerzy were also names used of him in contemporary use. Because of this, the English one should be used in English Wikipedia. No one can seriously claim that this monarch became known only through Russian sources. Maed 12:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

moves

[edit]

Knowing that there was the move "23:21, 18 April 2006 Valentinian m (moved Jurij I of Halicz to Yuriy I of Halych: Better spelling of the name.)", it is clear that Yuriy I of Halych has not been the original location of this article, contrarily to what Valentinian later falsely alleges in his edit comment on "20:48, 21 June 2006 Valentinian m (moved George I of Halych to Yuriy I of Halych: Returning page to its original name..." - if this is so heavy thing to V, perhaps this should be moved back to the original Jurij I of Halicz and then open a RM to where it possibly should be moved. However, I am happier with George I of Halych, and as long as this remains at that, I would not demand return to Jurij I of Halicz, which is the next alternative. Maed 13:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jurij is not a transliteration known in English, as you are no doubt aware. On 21 June I returned the darn thing to the name you moved it from, since nobody - at least according to Google - has heard of "George of Halycz". I've had enough. Valentinian (talk) 13:37, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This monarch was not exactly ruler of purely Russian land, and I foresee there are people who do not want this to be under any formulation which may dub this as a Russian. George is a tolerable place, to pre-empt some of such. Don't want an Ukrainian or Belarusan riot. Maed 13:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose the rule is the most known name used in English. Google has 0 hits for "George of Halych" (except 1 from a page you've edited.) Yuriy is not normally translated as "George", so it fails on two counts. Valentinian (talk) 18:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. My biggest issue on naming, has to do with which references are being used. This individual is not particularly well-known -- I've been unable to find a mention of him in any of my encyclopedias (and I don't have access to Ukraine-specific information at the moment). And there are no references listed on the page aside from an external link to a German-language family tree, so I have to ask, where is this information coming from? If it's coming from an English source, then the name on the Wikipedia article should probably reflect whatever name is used in that source. If the info is being translated from another language though, then the issue becomes trickier. --Elonka 19:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yuri I of Galicia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:22, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]