Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Benfer
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. (No consensus. 3 Delete / 2 Keep.) -- AllyUnion (talk) 06:56, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- This is probably my fault for voting Support (i.e. in support of deleting the page) when I should have specified Delete, but I believe the vote on this page was unanimously to delete it rather than no consensus. The comments by the two Support votes (including mine) bear this out. --Etimbo | Talk 12:39, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Google shows up several Robert Benfers, but none of them match the description here. This appears to be made up nonsense/vanity. --Etimbo | Talk 00:39, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Etimbo | Talk 00:39, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Support - seems to be little more than vanity --CDN99 19:20, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete This might be vanity, but it refers to something that is likely real; see http://www.animateclay.com/archive36.htm, which mentions the DVD's as being in short supply. However, it's worth deleting on the basis of being 'not notable', which is the reason behind the deletion of many pages about individual people. Courtland 03:52, 2005 Feb 12 (UTC)
- Delete Outside any other issues, the article fails to show notability. -- Cabhan 03:56, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. If a self-promoter cannot even create proper links he deserves automatic deletion. -- RWH 06:58, 2005 Feb 12 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.