User talk:Martey
Hiroshima / Nagasaki
[edit]Hi. May I ask why you removed this casualty estimate?
- The invasions of the main Japanese Islands of Kyushu and Honshu, if they were proportionately as deadly as the invasion of tiny Okinawa, would have created 500,000 to 1,000,000 U.S. casualties and 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 Japanese battle casualties, with more dying from starvation and disease.
Was it because it was unsourced, or what? Uncle Ed 12:47, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
Because it was unrelated to the source, and seemed like an attempt to influence the reader of the righteousness of bombing Hiroshima as opposed to just displaying the list of sources. If anything, it should have gone in the section about the debate on the legitimacy of the bombing, but there are already casualty estimates there. --Martey 03:21, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 00:36, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Sorry about that - it was a browser bug, not maliciousness. If you look at the content, you will notice that it was truncated at 4096 bytes. --Martey 00:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- I know, I saw your edit history and immediately realized you're not a vandal. Owen× ☎ 00:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
WikiProject Guster
[edit]I see that you've made edits in articles about Guster. I'm trying to create a WikiProject to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the band. If you're interested, please express interest for WikiProject Guster on the proposal page. Thanks! - [hmwith] |
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PGMG-Ep.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:PGMG-Ep.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
The reference to "Cobbs Creek Park" in the lyrics sounds as if it refers to a street name. Of course, I've been bombarding myself with enough Karate lately to figure "who knows" is as good a guess as any. Anyway, just checking as to whether the link should really be to Cobbs Creek, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.RadioKAOS (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- Looking at the lyrics again, I have changed the link to the section of the MOVE article on the 1985 bombing, since I think it is relatively clear that is what the song is referring to. --Martey (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Martey ... thank you so much for correcting my edit with a citation here; that was not a part of Lopez's bio that I recognized, so I thought it vandalism, and I should have checked more closely before removing the uncited text. I hope you are able to watch the article closely in the coming days, as events unfold; I am running out of guts to edit around Venezuelan events as deaths are occurring. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Martey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Martey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Martey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Martey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
User Group
[edit]Hi Martey, Hope you are doing good. Dig It Foundation a startup user group in Ghana want to increase it members.
We us a user group want to seek your permission to add you to our user group in Ghana which is geographical located in the western region and Sekondi-Takoradi us it capital.This is in view of the fact your experience and your sense of contribution towards various Wikipedia project is key. We wish for you to be listed on Dig it foundation meta user group page. We look forward to a positive reply Thank you Jwale2 (talk) 10:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:PGMG-Ep.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:PGMG-Ep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]You have been partial and acting on unfair & fake complaints.
[edit]Hi Martey, I know that you have acted under a pressure of some company or organization. There were no reasons to remove the citation as that was a genuine one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarineAdventure (talk • contribs) 14:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]I wondered what was going on with that article today and saw your note at RFPP (was going to request myself). Glad you figured it out! Hope it is protected soon. S0091 (talk) 15:46, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Hazel Massery has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)