Talk:Faro, Portugal

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Phoenicia Low‑importance

	Phoenicia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ossonoba

I am not sure about this, so I would like to hear confirmation from anyone, but I believe Faro was founded by Phoenicians (and it was them who gave it the name Ossonoba, meaning warehouse in Phoenician). During Roman times it was already called Ossonoba, so I seriously doubt it was the Moors who called it Ossonoba.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.23.105.69 (talk)

All the sources I could find say that it was the Romans who gave it the name "Ossonoba". On the other hand, the article doesn't say that the Moors gave it the name. --Mel Etitis ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>)]] 09:54, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree that Faro name is from Harun. Most likely it's from the word for a lighthouse - Pharos near Alexandria. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.113.155.72 (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Pharos is the greek word for lighthouse, not just "a" lighthouse. Obviously there could be a connection to that word, but there is no way I can tell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.76.106.30 (talk) 11:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Division in 2 pages

It does not make any sense to have a page for "Faro Municipality" and another to "Faro, Portugal"! All big cities have just one page. Should we divide Lisbon as well? We must have a coherent criteria. Of course Faro municipality's villages are many, but they can be referred in Faro's page. The info eill be at the end all the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.90.96.46 (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Faro, Portugal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140626153138/http://www.cncd.fr/frontoffice/bdd-region.asp?action=getRegion&id=2 to http://www.cncd.fr/frontoffice/bdd-region.asp?action=getRegion&id=2#tabs3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion: Include a Section on Tourism and Attractions

I think it would be beneficial to add a section about tourism and things to do in the area. Including details about popular attractions, local cuisine, and activities would provide readers with a more comprehensive view of the destination.

Such a section could highlight:

Key tourist attractions
Recommended activities for visitors
Information on local events and festivals
Suggestions for accommodations and dining options

What does everyone think about this idea? I believe it would enhance the article and make it more useful for readers planning to visit.

Sabilla27 (talk) 16:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]