Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacey Lynn

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 14:47, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

Stacey Lynn

600 google hits, at least 20% of which seem to be for a completely different Stacey Lynn. NN? Grutness|^hello? 05:57, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Actually, she is quite well known and I get 17,000 hits on google Moumine 21:49, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Keep and expand. Appears notable. Megan1967 01:43, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Seems to be a non-notable model who appears in a non-notable (fitness/swimsuit/cheesecake?) calendar. Quale 03:34, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. She's appeared to be popular within the Canadian fitness model community some time ago, but according to This thread at Musclemag, she appearently is no longer a fitness model, but a bartender. --LBMixPro ^{(Holla back!)} 07:19, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Notable models should not be expected to continue their modeling careers into middle age. Dystopos 00:13, 3 May 2005 (UTC) Change to Delete (Unless someone hits a goldmine of notable information). There are no 17,000 hits for this person, whose name is actually Stacey Lynn Boetto. All references lead back to this calendar series, which lasted from 1999-2001. It's possible, if it really was such a hot seller, that the calendar is notable. Stacey, apparently, is not. Dystopos 20:19, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Those who think she is notable can expand the stub. Since her notability is based entirely on her exposure, maybe a good PD photo would be enough to schwing my vote. Dystopos 20:22, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I agree with what Dystopos said.--Unfocused 16:51, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Five edits, four to VFD.
- Please sign your posts. I don't appreciate my opinion being impugned anonymously. I still agree with what Dystopos originally said, but apparently, 3 years of national exposure as a "best selling calendar" girl, if only in Canada ;) isn't good enough for some of you to leave as a stub. --Unfocused 18:37, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Obscure and not worthy of an encyclopedia entry. --Mecanismo 20:50, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Coulda been a contenda. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:06, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.