User talk:Alanmak

Away from Wikipedia

I am now not as active in Wikipedia as I was two years ago. I apologize for not being able to reply to your messages promptly. - Alan (talk) 02:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of circulating currencies. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 13:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alanmak. If you don't revert the article again for at least 24 hours, it is possible that no action will be taken. See the latest comment in the report at WP:AN3. Please use the article talk page to reach consensus. EdJohnston (talk) 18:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sha Tin

How do we work together? I am mainly concerned about the private housing estates and shopping centres in the district. Ricky@36 (talk) 14:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Street template

Is there any reason why you remove the street template from articles? And can you fix the template so that Cantonese is displayed before Mandarin in Hong Kong articles in the Chinese template? Umofomo (talk) 18:37, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chinese

Whatever you tried to do with this edit to Template:Chinese broke the template horribly. Please test changes to templates before you make them. And if you were trying to do what Umofomo asked above (make Cantonese display above Mandarin only on certain articles), that kind of change likely cannot be made (I don't think you can make a template behave differently only on some articles) so please do not try to do that again. -Amake (talk) 06:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shopping centres in Hong Kong

I have added some of shopping centres in the list you mentioned. Ricky@36 (talk) 06:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me reserve Celestial Heights articles

Some foreigners don't understand the buildings of Celestial Heights and said the article is worth deleting. I am afraid they can easily remove Hong Kong property articles later. Please support me to reserve the article. Ricky@36 (talk) 01:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

香港私人屋苑被加tag

佢地好似關於香港的屋苑都加notability，我地有無得投訴佢地種族歧視？Ricky@36 (talk) 05:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

條友叫RadioXXX Ricky@36 (talk) 05:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 佢地成日話我地講的屋苑唔聞名，佢地唔識就話唔聞名，我地夠可以話佢地唔聞名，一樣可以加tag。我俾晒所有reference落文章度，佢地仍話有問題，擺明喺度搞事Ricky@36 (talk) 05:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 你搵返晒所有被tag屋苑的原作者，唔該 Ricky@36 (talk) 06:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 唔該幫手除番晒所有私家樓的notability tag呀，條友成日係咁加，玩針對。 Ricky@36 (talk) 15:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IPAEng

Hi Alan,

{{IPAEng}} has been renamed {{IPA-en}}. The old name is being phased out. kwami (talk) 11:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, please try to follow the IPA key linked by the template. Otherwise many of our readers won't understand what the symbols mean. If the key doesn't cover a distinction you need, please bring it up on the IPA key talkpage. Thanks, kwami (talk) 11:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

求救幫忙﹗

又有人得鬼閒話delete公屋文，佢地咁搞我地香港人唔使生存。請支持保留公屋文﹗Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tin Tsz Estate同Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shek Yam East Estate Ricky@36 (talk) 15:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Charles K. Kao. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --Aqwis (talk) 14:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

馬鞍山私人屋苑

我已經表達支持保留你兩篇馬鞍山私樓的文章，但我覺得開始有部份外國人唔係咁支持呢種行為，你睇下紀錄，就知道一二Ricky@36 (talk) 00:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wu Kai Sha Station. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. tedder (talk) 07:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pic of The Peninsula in in the article Hong Kong

Hi there~ Very sorry that I removed your fine pic, there seems to be way too many pic on that page and even if a pic need to be added to the architecture section, that pic has to be of architecture significance, to tell at least a architectural style or identify of Hong Kong. The windows details of Peninsula is quite plain and modest compare to other examples of neo-classical building, and the columns are so small that the classical order can't even be identified with certainty =_="". If u have other pics of better significance feel free to add again. ^^ Da Vynci (talk) 05:04, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong

This user helped promote Hong Kong to good article status.

Well done. SilkTork *^YES! 14:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mong Kok

You would certainly agree that noone today would call the area "Argyle". So writing "Mong Kok (also Mongkok or Argyle)" in the first sentence of the article is misleading, since it gives the impression that the area is still called this way. If, as I may understand, the area was called "Argyle" sometime between 1979 and 1985, then a detailed explanation would be welcome in the "Name" paragraph of the article.

My understanding was that the MTR station was named "Argyle Station" after Argyle Street, Hong Kong in 1979. That is what the Mong Kok Station article says. I can understand that the area was later called casually by extension after the name of the station, which is exactly what happened with "Jordan", "Prince Edward" or even "Tin Hau". This is when "Argyle Building" was named. Then in 1985, the name of the station was changed to "Mong Kok" and people stopped calling the area "Argyle" in English.

Again, if that is the course of events, then it would be better to include it in the "Name" section. Writing "Argyle" in the intro line is not appropriate.

Best. olivier (talk) 15:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply on my talk page. I believe that we essentially do not disagree. I have made some changes to the article, which I hope you will find appropriate. olivier (talk) 14:50, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Regional differences in the Chinese language for deletion

The article Regional differences in the Chinese language is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional differences in the Chinese language until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 23:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:ThePeninsulaBeforeWWII.png

Thank you for uploading File:ThePeninsulaBeforeWWII.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

page review

can you please review this page: sakib

thanks :)--Historyfeelings - talk 06:59, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Macau in Portuguese

I would like to thank you, in the name of all Lusophone Wikipedians, for the somewhat detailed administrative map of Macau you've developed and made available here. Keep up the good work. - Popotão (talk) 07:37, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revived interest in the film Infernal Affairs

Invitation to participate in the poll for Infernal Affairs.

From your edits for the film Infernal Affairs there is presently a poll taking place on The Departed film Talk page regarding whether you believe a separate subsection should be included for (a) Infernal Affairs as a source for the plot of The Departed film, and/or (b) a second subsection for the recently captured crime figure Whitey Bulger as the source for the character played by Jack Nicholson in the film.

The recent capture of Bulger has revived the question from two years ago of Infernal Affairs from when it did have a separate subsection on The Departed film page which was deleted by User:RepublicanJ, now known as User:OldJ. Invite to visit The Departed Talk page, to the Bulger section at the end of the Page, to participate in the Poll currently taking place. 208.120.96.227 (talk) 11:19, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

contact

I would like to talk to you about your work on historical timezones in China. Can we communicate by email? Mine is on my user's page. I would hope that you can provide me with a copy of the article 建国初期的北京时间 by Guo, Qingsheng (2003) , and possibly a translation of that article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aloist (talk • contribs) 17:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BLMCSS-Hall.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:BLMCSS-SchoolBangeAtHall.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Sha Tin Heights Tunnel

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sha Tin Heights Tunnel, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) 10:28, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:UCSBStorkeTower&UCen.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:UCSBStorkeTower&UCen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ma On Shan Road for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ma On Shan Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma On Shan Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 08:45, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Usage of the terms railroad and railway for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Usage of the terms railroad and railway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Usage of the terms railroad and railway until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mathglot (talk) 20:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ma On Shan Road

The article Ma On Shan Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not particularly noteworthy; lack of established sources in websearch

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 11:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Tuenmun-PositionWithinHKSAR.jpg

The file File:Tuenmun-PositionWithinHKSAR.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality, superseded by File:Hong Kong Tuen Mun District.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:North-PositionWithinHKSAR.jpg

The file File:North-PositionWithinHKSAR.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality, superseded by File:Hong Kong North District.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:HongKong&EastAsiaLatitude.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:HongKong&EastAsiaLatitude.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]