Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishop Kearney Field

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - redirected - SimonP 01:41, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

Bishop Kearney Field

This isn't even about a school. It's about a non-notable athletic field at a non-notable school. Delete with extreme prejudice. Neutrality^talk 23:25, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

Delete non-notable dirt. Gazpacho 02:19, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vegaswikian 02:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:46, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with and create school article. Lupin 02:49, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, pro-sports venue establishes notability, although it would be nice to have an article about the school which it serves, and the field entry a mere part of it. Rlquall 02:52, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with and create school article. --BaronLarf 03:29, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Looking at the article I notice that it's the home field of a highly successful pro Lacrosse team. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 03:34, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Gamaliel 03:36, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. --Calton | Talk 03:58, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. The Rochester Rattlers deserve an article; this field doesn't. Quale 04:06, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. Megan1967 04:41, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Verifiable and NPOV. First, preserve knowledge, then expand knowledge. When there's a school article, we can merge this into that. But thanks to all the VfD traffic, I have no time to do it myself. --Unfocused 04:54, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with the appropriate school or school district article. Kelly Martin 05:14, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Delete the article and the fruitcakes voting to keep it! come on! Gmaxwell 05:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Please remain civil and refrain from insults. --Unfocused 06:14, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Rochester, New York and delete - Skysmith 09:52, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all fields. Wait, do you know how dumb that just sounded? Because it is, it really is. Master Thief Garrett 11:03, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn. R adiant _* 14:35, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Delete trivial CDC (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone writes an article about the school before end of VfD, in which case merge and redirect. JYolkowski // talk 20:45, 17 May 2005 (UTC)Looks like someone's created the school article and merged the content in, so redirect. JYolkowski // talk 02:16, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notability is still not a listed deletion criterion - David Gerard 22:42, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE No, notability is not a deletion criterion, but the logic of keeping this article implies that we create entries for all fields named after bishops around the world. Keep a perspective of a Martian who just landed on planet earth, people! Project2501a 22:57, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notability is still not a deletion criterion. It's NPOV and verifiable. That's sufficient. James F. (talk) 23:04, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable field used for playing major league lacross. Klonimus 13:23, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. (1)We don't even have a policy about schools yet, (2)schools are important and should be included, (3)this massive deletion campaign is terrible. Introduce a limit of 3 vfd nominations per day. Expand this stub. Project Schoolwatch. --Zantastik 22:33, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete - I don't usually enter into VfD debates but I'll make an exception for this. Broken Segue 00:14, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this is the sports field of a major league lacross team, and should not become an innocent victim of the schools controversy. Kappa 22:21, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this goes beyond our normal "to school or not to school" debate. This is the home field of a professional sports team. - Jersyko 01:17, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.