Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reynardine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 18:57, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reynardine

Information is subtrivial -- an interpretation of a song? Delete. --Improv 18:45, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep, cleanup. This is legit English folklore as far as I know. The tale precedes the song, and the song provides some proof of noteworthiness. Smerdis of Tlön 20:21, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- While still a stub, it should be slightly better now. Smerdis of Tlön 20:39, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
~~Abstain~~: Reynard the Fox is really quite important. He shows up all over the place and has been used as a vehicle for satire, from Chaucer on. Reynardine, though.... Yeesh. Keep. (Sub-topic, really, but I agree that it's a longstanding ballad figure, just, well, not a really major one.) Geogre 21:02, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep based on improvements to article. Gamaliel 21:09, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Given the effort Ihcoyc has put into this article, it is now evident that it is notable. Thanks! Even though I'm the one who nominated it, it needs to stay on VfD for due process, I guess, but I'm changing my vote to Keep. --Improv 21:53, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep improved version. Original was a substub that had me scratching my head. - RedWordSmith 22:13, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
sly bold keep -- Jmabel | Talk 00:46, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Valid topic. — Gwalla | Talk 03:00, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
keep, after improvement Lectonar 13:01, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.