Jump to content

Talk:Gregg Easterbrook

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I don't understand this sentence:

he first spells out a number of statistical figures that show today's Americans are better off then any past generation, yet they still confess they are happier than before or even some less happy RickK | Talk 02:53, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)

This article is currently disorganized, largely because of my additions. If I don't get around to cleaning it up, someone else might want to, possibly splitting it into sections. Thanks, Dave 07:20, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

Considering how much Easterbrook has written and that he is a generally respected commentator, I don't think it's appropriate for the vast majority of this article to be taken up by the "Kill Bill controversy." 67.68.213.125 19:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty much ancient history at this point. Since it did lead to his canning by ESPN, it deserves a mention -- but it probably could be reduced in size significantly. Powers 20:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with you both. I have edited the section down some. Please review my edits to see if you feel they still do the topic justice. Jacob1207 01:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine. Powers T 19:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content

About those cognomen

[edit]

Here are a list of cognomen that i've seen in TMQ that aren't here:

Arizona (CAUTION: MIGHT KNOCK YOU OUT OF PLAYOFFS) Cardinals (2003)
Chicago Daxiongmao (the Mandarin word for Pandas) (2003)
Cincinnati Bungles (2002)
Cincinnati Fudgsicles (2003)
Cincinnati Garfields (2003)
Cincinnati Candy Corns (2003)
Cleveland Browns (Release 2.1) (200?)
Cleveland Oranges (Release 2.1) (200?)
Cleveland Browns (Beta Version) (2004)
Denver Parentheses (2003)
Indianapolis Horsies (200?)
Indianapolis offense : the Abandoned Quarry Offense (2004)
Jacksonville Inkspots (2003)
Jacksonville Cyanotic Cats (2005)
Jacksonville Rampant Azure (playoffs 2005)
Kansas City Flintstones (2005)
Miami Ventral Fins (2004)
New Orleans Boy Scouts
Potomac Nanticokes (Wsh - 2004)
San Diego Lightning Bolts
San Francisco Squared 4.949s (2004)
Seattle Dropped Passes Group (playoff 2005)
Seattle Folgers (playoff 2005)
Beijing Gang of Eleven (2004) name for the first NFL expansion team for China

The question those raise is do we want a history of those cognomen or only the current ones ?

Also, should we include the nicknames he used for coaches/players & stadia?
Examples:

Bill "Master Qui-Jon" Parcells
Bill "Obi-Wan" Belichick
Can't Demolish It Too Soon Field (Eagles stadium)
Chainsaw Dan (Dan Snider - 2006) Coach Cratchit (Mike Sherman - playoff 2005) Dan "Lord Voldemort" Snyder
Disposable Razor Field (NE stadium)
Empty Stadium (Arizona Cardinals stadium)
Formerly Named for a Mob Firm Coliseum (Tennessee Titans stadium)
Jean Chretien, prime minister of Canada (Official Name: America's Suburb)
Jon "I Was Teenaged Coach" Gruden
Ketchup Field (Heinz Field - Steelers stadium)
Mora the Younger (Jim Mora - playoff 2005) Next One Will Have Five Blades Field (NE stadium 2004)
Next One Will Vibrate Field (NE stadium 2004 #2)
Not Bankrupt Yet Coliseum (Oakland Raiders stadium)
Owner/Menace to Western Civilization Dan Snyder (2000)
Oranges Stadium (Cleveland stadium)
Please Don't Buy From Invesco Field (Denver Broncos stadium)
Professor Dumbledore (Joe Gibbs - 2004)
Steve "Dobby the Elf" Spurrier

Daclown 16:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes and Philosophies

[edit]

I'm not in agreement with the inclusion of these, or any, quotations here. Certainly if there were a pithy or profound quotation for which Mr. Easterbrook were particularly well known, or which particularly summed up Mr. Easterbrook's philosophies, I'd say "great." However, the quotes I removed do not seem to add to the article.

Now, it might well be appropriate to add a section about Mr. Easterbrook's general philosophies, such as his practical liberalism, his support and defense of religious faith, and/or his football themes such as the cowardliness of frequent punting and the egomania of the typical coach. Someday I may even write these when I get the time. But each of these requires a paragraph, preferably with citations, rather than a mere single quotation. Moishe Rosenbaum 00:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Spygate Criticism

[edit]

I edited his Spygate criticism from "his over the top response" to "his response" I think it's more NPOV. Also, it should be noted that his fellow Page 2 editor is a Pats Fan. That should be noted as well.

Opps, nevermind, that little detail was already added. 03:49, 10 June 2008 (UTC)~

Splitting Tuesday Morning Quarterback

[edit]

I propose that the TMQ material be spun off into its own article, Tuesday Morning Quarterback (which currently redirects to the applicable section of the present article). With so much of the article devoted to TMQ, it makes that column seem more important than it is, given Easterbrook's other achievement and contributions. Besides, TMQ is not equivalent with Easterbrook, as both section and article have grown, it's now, I think, justifiable to split them. Any objections? Jacob1207 (talk) 21:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I Agree, I think the TMQ section would be better as a standalone article

~G 01:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit]

I recently cleaned out a bit of links from the External links section of the article. These may be used to source the content that is in the article, but as Wikipedia isn't a depository for external links I have relocated them here. Anyone is welcome to use them to source the article.

ThemFromSpace 03:48, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I added back the articles written by Easterbrook in a new section the article on him. As a writer, Easterbrook's body of work is certainly important for this article; it's equivalent to a bibliography or filmography. Jacob1207 (talk) 16:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I removed a few more. --Malerooster (talk) 18:43, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Space Program Criticism

[edit]

This article presents a very one-sided view of EasterBrook's space program reporting. His 1980 article was general and didn't really predict anything - the claim that it made him a notable commentator on the space program is subjective at best - and his subsequent reporting (particularly on the Shuttle and its two crashes) has been biased and riddled with factual errors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.50.85.72 (talk) 06:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you have sources to back up the above, please post them. See WP:V for details on what Wikipedia requires. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gregg Easterbrook. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

  • Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=express&s=editorial102003

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gregg Easterbrook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:06, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gregg Easterbrook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why are his brothers not mentioned in the family section?

[edit]

The Wikipedia entry for Frank Easterbrook mentions two brothers, including Gregg. Gregg's entry does not mention brothers. ChicagoCurmudgeon (talk) 14:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gregg_Easterbrook&oldid=1207075701"