Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malmoe
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect to Malmö without merger of current contents. Rossami (talk) 06:16, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This seems to be advertising/vanity for a non-notable publication. This "newspaper" is "available for free in bars and clubs all over Austria". Even though I belong to its target group, I've never heard of it. Martg76 12:12, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Malmö --Angr/(comhrá) 05:31, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Austria, possibly under the 'miscellaneous topics' section. Don't redirect to Malmö (it is not related to the city of Malmö in Sweden). Paradiso 06:52, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Malmö. Not everyone is able to write "ö" using keyboard. "oe" is a standard ASCII replacement. Grue 07:26, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Keep in mind that, despite sounding the same, this article has nothing to do with Malmö. Paradiso 07:33, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. I stand by my vote above. Malmoe should be a redirect to Malmö because (1) not everyone knows that Swedish ö cannot be expanded to oe (as German ö can), and (2) even if they do know, not everyone can conveniently type ö, as Grue pointed out. The fact that the article under discussion is not about Malmö is irrelevant. The magazine Malmoe is IMO not notable enough for a merger with Austria. --Angr/(comhrá) 14:14, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.