Talk:Physics and Beyond

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

The book is actually called Der Teil und das Ganze, translating to The Part and The Whole. I'm new to Wikis, so I won't change it yet as I don't know whether I'll break cross-references. I'll get back on this. 217.81.53.207

Google hits: A Part and The Whole = 177 The Part and The Whole = 941

I shall move it. Any objections? Angela 23:09, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Book?

I'm very interested in the book but can't find it anywhere in English. Is it possible it was never translated? Hard to believe but I suppose it's possible. Seems like it would be a worthwhile project.

Seems like it has been published in English under the title "Physics and Beyond". MikeEnnen (talk) 21:33, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's Physics and Beyond Allen & Unwin, 1971 Feraudyh (talk) 14:34, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:36, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]