Talk:Detailed timeline for Jesus

In order to try to work out the relationship between all the various pages and hopefully get some consensus, I have opened a WikiProject to centralize discussion and debate. We've got several "conflicted" pages at the moment, and without centralizing discussion, it's going to get very confusing. Please join the project, if you're interested in the topic, and start discussions on the talk page. (We need to create a to-do list, but I think the current state is too conflicted to decide even that.) Mpolo 10:49, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)

Merge?

I don't think this should be merged with New Testament view on Jesus' life, as the New Testament does not directly provide dates, and this article is frankly a different subject. Therefore, I'm removing the merge request from the header. Wesley 04:56, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Absolutely agree with you here. It should be linked, but not merged. Mpolo 08:09, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)

It shouldn't be merged, but it should be renamed. "Detailed timeline for Jesus"? This isn't a gift package for Jesus, it's a timeline of presumed events in Jesus' life. -Silence 23:16, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, it should be merged, but it shouldn't be merged with New Testament view on Jesus' life; it should be merged with Chronology of Jesus' birth and death into a general Chronology of Jesus article, both solving that article's problem (too limited in scope, dealing only with his birth and death and not with everything in between) and this article's problem (too short and stubby, with next to no potential for growth; could work just as well as a subsection in another page, with the advantage of not requiring you go to a whole new page to read it). I'm adding the merger tag. Let's talk about this. -Silence 03:27, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Experimenting with some possible ways to synthesize them on User:Silence/Time; thoughts? Of course, we neesn't do anything fancy if just putting the info in a normal section would work. I also welcome other solutions to the problems with the two current articles. -Silence 04:43, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please merge it

Yes Yes,. Please merge!