Talk:Interstate 80

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Interstate 80 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 31 days

U.S. Roads: Interstates Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

Interstate Highways

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article does not require a junction list.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in April 1, 2008, February 2014.

Auxiliary routes

Should there be a section on this article that lists the auxiliary routes of I-80? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 17:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currently this is handled via thisinfobox at the bottom of the page. IMHO that is sufficient. However, I don't have any strong feelings either way if this would be better handled by the current infobox or a list.Dave (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well the infobox is not available on the mobile version of Wikipedia. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 22:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is a valid argument to say that infobox isn't mobile viewer friendly and so either needs to be re-written or replaced with something else. That infobox has been around a while, it was probably designed before mobile web viewing became normal. Being as how you are the one that noticed the problem, I'd advise to create some mockups of some redesigns/replacements in your userspace and invite some people to test which is the most readable for both computer and mobile viewing. Dave (talk) 18:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will see if I can get around to doing that. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 08:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]