User talk:Mathmo
|
/Archive/2006, /Archive/2007, /Archive/2008, /Archive/2009, /Archive/2010 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
[edit]- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
[edit]- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Your edit to Yahya Sinwar
[edit]Hello Mathmo. I have reverted your rollback at Yahya Sinwar, in which you unexplainedly brought back the label of "Palestinian terrorist" in the short description (from "Palestinian militant"). Terrorist designations by United States and European Union authorities should not automatically be added to articles in WP:Wikivoice since U.S. and the EU designations have their own POV. Per MOS:TERRORIST, descriptors such as "terrorist" are "best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject[.]
" For the article to refer to him as a terrorist, a sort of consensus amongst reliable sources should first be established on the talk page. I also want to mention that your use of rollback in that edit does not fall under the accepted uses of rollback, and it's especially a good idea to use edit summaries at contentious topics articles. Thank you for understanding. Nythar (💬-🍀) 06:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
[edit]- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug