User talk:Mido

Gospel of Barnabas

Hi

I note you reverted the revert on whether the GoB is to be counted as Islamic. I re-instated this a few days ago, as that was the wish of another reader.

There is no point in being over-precious about this - as I would fully agree that the GoB differs strongly from orthodox Islam on many points.

But, on the other hand, there seem to be many readers who advance the view of this Gospel as fundamentally Islamic - albeit corrupted in transmission.

Would it not be more-inclusive to leave the-cross reference in?

regards TomHennell 02:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank your for your explanation - most helpful TomHennell 14:52, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with Arabic...

The non-english Wikipedias must be both exciting (so much to do!) and frustrating (so much to do.) Good luck with that. -- ForteTuba

RfA Results and Thanks

Mido, thank you for supporting me in my recent RfA. Although it did not succeed as no consensus was declared (final: 65/29/7), I know that there is always an opportunity to request adminship again. If and when that day comes, I hope you will once again support me. If at any time I make any mistakes or if you would like to comment on my contributions to Wikipedia, you are more than welcome to do so. Regardless of your religious, cultural, and personal beliefs, I pray that whatever and whoever motivates you in life continues to guide you on the most righteous path.

--- joturner 02:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please help on Ancient Egypt

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Ancient Egypt was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by Pruneau 18:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Architecture Wikiproject

Hi, many thanks for all your architecture and design edits. I was wondering if you might be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture. Also we've been revamping the Architecture Portal and nominations to Portal:Architecture/Selected picture candidates and Portal:Architecture/Selected article candidates will always be welcome.--Mcginnly 09:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahlan wu'Sahlan

Ahlan Mido,

I was wondering if you could spell these Arabs names in Arabic for the Wikipedia pages:

Salim Tuama Walid Badir Abed Rabah

Shukran jazilan. - NYC2TLV posted on June 28th

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mann.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mann.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zamalek

Hi, i am a member of the WP:FOOTY project here, and my attention was drawn to the Zamalek article which was in a considerable mess. I have cleaned it up as much as i can now. I need a little help in improving the notable players section and the managers section. I think the managers section is inaccurate and would like your input or sources. Also, i have little knowledge of Egyptian football so i am not sure about how notable some of the players are in relation to the football club. Any help, be it editing or pointing to sources, would be much appreciated. If not, don't worry, i will keep looking for sources. Thanks Woodym555 21:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contact

Hi Mido, did you receive my mail, heiko from pediapress ? He!ko (talk) 11:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sherif.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sherif.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]