Talk:Allergy

This article was copy edited by Rsjaffe, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 31 August 2022.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Medicine: Dermatology / Translation Top‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was a past Medicine Collaboration of the Week.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Allergy.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 1 May 2010. Further details are available here.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Caesarean section delivery and the risk of allergic disorders in childhood

It would seem appropriate to include a brief mention of the association between caesarian section deliveries and allergic disorders, which is well documented in the relevant scientific literature (e.g. Renz-Polster H, David MR, Buist AS, Vollmer WM, O'Connor EA, Frazier EA, Wall MA. Caesarean section delivery and the risk of allergic disorders in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Nov;35(11):1466-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02356.x. PMID: 16297144.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:1227:D1F4:EC12:4B5F:672F:D28C (talk) 11:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Idiosyncracies

Editors of this page might consider including "idiosyncracies", which is what allergies were called in 1870. Sources on archive.org and newspapers.com . Also, there could be more attention to cerebral allergies, a problem that is underdiagnosed, resulting in the abuse of persons with psychiatric sequelae, including brain fog, depression, anxiety, learning and behavioral disabilities. When such patients are not identified, practitioners risk causing preventable harm. Liquidvisual (talk) 17:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Testing

The testing section should include a discussion on intradermal dilution testing and modified quantitative testing. Prophylax (talk) 17:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Details regarding controls, wheal size, and interpretation were added to the skin prick testing section. Prophylax (talk) 18:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative medicine

Should there be a section discussing alternative medicine treatment for allergy (eg, herbal, traditional Chinese medicine)? Prophylax (talk) 20:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These methods are unscientific and usually intentional quackery. No WP:MEDRS sources would justify discussing them in the encyclopedia. Zefr (talk) 21:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Washing

Best treatment for contact allergens. Wash!!!!! Shower preferably. Get rid of the allergen. Never gets mentioned. So frustrating. 106.69.198.45 (talk) 23:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is probably sensible that we rework the Management section a little, to address the acute, as well as the chronic factors of allergies. It is hard to find sources that talk directly about what to do if exposed to known allergens in such a simple manner as washing off the allergen, though maybe because it is presumed common sense? I note the Mayo Clinic suggests “Soak in a soothing cool bath” as a treatment for the symptoms of contact dermatitis,[1] but that may be beyond the remit of this article. Other more common advice could certainly be talked about, as it is common to see “don’t scratch the skin”, for example.

It is important to remember that Wikipedia is not a medical guide though, and our primary job is not to provide treatment advice. — HTGS (talk) 04:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alcoholism

Throughout my life and with some research I have come to believe alcoholism is an allergy, should this be listed as part of the 'allergy' topic in Wikipedia.org? Marisha16 (talk) 21:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was suggested by the AA people, but is not discussed as a literal physical response to alcoholism by rational medical experts. The best source I could find discussing the idea is this 1972 psychiatric article, and it really doesn’t lead me to see it as appropriate for this article. — HTGS (talk) 04:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pine nuts are not nuts

As clearly stated in Wikipedia they are seeds, adding them in the tree nut category is very wrong. 209.93.243.30 (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. Sort of. If this were an article focused on botany. However, this is an article on allergy. "Tree nut" is not a common botanical term. "Tree nut" is not a strict botanical term, but rather a culinary and regulatory classification.The FDA is a good authority https://snacksafely.com/2022/03/nuts-what-they-really-are-and-how-the-fda-classifies-them-as-allergens/ The FDA's classificaiton is probably designed to save lives. I am reluctant to endorse a choice designed to save lives as "very wrong". Jaredroach (talk) 14:47, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]