Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Sutu & Andrew Morrison
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 19:05, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
As the article says, these two are only up coming book writers, and their debut book has not been published yet. Thus, not noteworthy yet. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:13, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I also get zero hits on Amazon.com. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:16, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and good luck to you two. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:47, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I am an up an comming writer but I don't have an article. Not notable. --metta, The Sunborn 03:09, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - lots of people are writing books, that doesn't mean anything. Article title is useless, as well. -- Cyrius|✎ 05:53, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable (yet). Megan1967 06:39, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wait until they are famous and worthy of a biography. I'd almost suggest that Benjamin Sutu and/or Andrew Morrison had a hand in writing it. Suggest they keep it to their user pages and personal web pages. Internodeuser 13:25, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and write two seperate pages if these two ever become notable. Jamyskis 13:33, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete wait until you're notable, and don't write it yourself, guys. - Etacar11 16:27, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. NN Jayjg (talk) 16:12, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Swat 16:27, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. ROFLMAOACSOFMM (basically a very big ROFLMAO (roll on the floor laughing my ass off) I know these guys... lol... they are two 13 year old morons who do nothing bu vandalise the net... and they write about themselves?....
16:12, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I know this sounds a bit weird, but I am Andrew Morrison, and I did not in any way request for, or want for that matter, a Wikipedia page to be written about me. (I'm not trying to "shift the blame", so to speak, but Ben must have been the person who wrote the article.) Although I am trying to write a book, I don't think this qualifies as a Wikipedia entry. In fact, it is quite embarrasing... I sincerely apologise, on his behalf, for any inconvenience caused to fellow Wikipedia users.
- Comment. It's Andrew again. Sorry if this is irritating, but I do find it rather unfair that a previous user, with whom I am personally acquanted, stated that I "vandalise the net." For the record, I have done nothing of the kind. I did write the article on Adeline Yen Mah, but I hardly think this qualifies as "vandalism."
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so they should come back after they have successfully published a book. — JIP | Talk 05:15, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.