Talk:Pauline Hanson
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pauline Hanson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Pauline Hanson was copied or moved into Tony Abbott with this edit on 17 July 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
"emotional" speech
[edit]Can the scare quotes be removed? For a NPOV, it either needs to be fleshed out who stated the speech was emotional or removed. At present, it comes across sarcastic, which leads to a lack of neutrality while reading the article. 2603:7080:9207:AD00:A1D3:785:7834:874D (talk) 21:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2022
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Pauline Hanson's first son is inaccurately recorded as Anthony born in 1972. His actual full name is Tony and he was born in 1971. (Since I am married to him, I know this to be fact. Thanks.) 70.189.237.235 (talk) 18:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- We need a reliable source to make changed. Please provide a published secondary source that proves this to be true and I will gladly make the change. Thank you. Nightenbelle (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Nightenbelle: Arguably, the entire first paragraph about Hanson's first two sons should be removed. There is no source currently cited for their names or the then-spouse's name; the Sydney Morning Herald article cited in the next paragraph[1] refers to the first spouse and two sons by aliases. Per BLP, I'm inclined to delete all three names from the paragraph. —C.Fred (talk) 20:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Go for it. As a Non-COI person you can make whatever changes you would like. I'm just not going to alter information based off the word of an IP who claims to be the subject's spouse. Anyone can claim anything online- source and I'll make the change. As for other things that should be removed- I didn't look at the article- just saw this as patrolling recent changes for vandalism. Nightenbelle (talk) 20:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- I have been bold and simply followed our standard approach, and removed details of non-notable children. HiLo48 (talk) 02:52, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Go for it. As a Non-COI person you can make whatever changes you would like. I'm just not going to alter information based off the word of an IP who claims to be the subject's spouse. Anyone can claim anything online- source and I'll make the change. As for other things that should be removed- I didn't look at the article- just saw this as patrolling recent changes for vandalism. Nightenbelle (talk) 20:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Nightenbelle: Arguably, the entire first paragraph about Hanson's first two sons should be removed. There is no source currently cited for their names or the then-spouse's name; the Sydney Morning Herald article cited in the next paragraph[1] refers to the first spouse and two sons by aliases. Per BLP, I'm inclined to delete all three names from the paragraph. —C.Fred (talk) 20:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Conspiracy theorist? Really?
[edit]I think that we should remove Category:Australian conspiracy theorists from the list of categories on this page. I don't really think that Pauline Hanson is classified as a conspiracy theorist. 203.129.22.32 (talk) 08:50, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- I agree.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 August 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
add Category:Australian political party founders 43.247.66.161 (talk) 23:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Done [2] Mitch Ames (talk) 00:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 1 November 2024
[edit]It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Pauline Hanson. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Add federal court judge ruling (decided 1/11/24) to "Racism allegations" section.
A judge has ruled that One Nation leader Pauline Hanson racially discriminated against Deputy Greens leader Mehreen Faruqi in a tweet. Judge Stewart stated that the message in Pauline's tweet "is a variant of the slogan, “go back to where you came from” (T158:33). That slogan is a racist trope with a long history." and that "It carries with it historical anti-immigrant and nativist beliefs with roots, in Australia, that are traceable to the White Australia Policy."
Sources: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-01/pauline-hanson-mehreen-faruqi-racial-tweet-verdict/104547814 https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca1264 Austarbox (talk) 06:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Australia articles
- Mid-importance Australia articles
- B-Class Queensland articles
- Low-importance Queensland articles
- WikiProject Queensland articles
- B-Class Australian politics articles
- High-importance Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests