User talk:Ravidreams
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Hyacinth 11:13, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Munich
[edit]When adding links to other language wikipedia entries, please write some note in English in the edit summary. Generally people write (interwiki:ta) or something along those lines. This just makes it easier for other editors to tell what you did. DirectorStratton 20:00, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
Ilaiyaraaja
[edit]Hi Ravi, Thank you for writing back. It's good to hear from you. Keep up the good job there at Tamil Wikipedia. I will heed your advice and try to ask the people over at Raaja Sir's official website for permission to use some pictures. Would appreciate any help that you can provide to help us improve the Ilaiyaraaja page here at English Wikipedia. Best wishes and take care, AppleJuggler 14:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Interview with Ilaiyaraaja in the Tamil edition of the magazine India Today (the 3rd August 2005 issue) -- have you read it?
[edit]- Found something useful for your work on the Tamil Wikipedia's Ilaiyaraaja article. Apparently, Ilaiyaraaja was featured in the front cover of the Tamil edition of India Today (see here). This 3rd August 2005 issue contains an interview with the composer. Have you read it? I presume it is published in the Tamil language. I don't read the Tamil language, and so the article would not be accessible to me. But it might be useful to you. I would also appreciate it if you can provide me with some details of its content if you manage to find this article and read it. It will be very helpful for my work on the English version Wikipedia article for Ilaiyaraja. Thank you, and have a nice week. AppleJuggler 04:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]I saw that you made a vote on the vote on Tamil-Americans. You have either put 'Keep' or 'Delete' in front of your vote to cast your vote (Upto my knowledge). Thanks and have a nice day Praveen 13:20, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for your note in my user talk page re Tamil language page edits. Please keep a watch on this page- when the tamil-haters revert correct information, please step in to stop this act, which I think is a clear case of vandalism but they claim is content dispute. These guys resort to such indecent behaviour even when excellent supporting references are provided. So, do help us by undoing some of their acts of vandalism masquerading as 'content-dispute'. --Aadal 12:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Re Romanization of Tamil
[edit]Ravi, you left a message in my userpage about a request for an artilce on romanization of Tamil. I'm not sure I understand the request well enough. The next month or so is going to be extremely hectic for me and I won't be able to start anything seriously now. I thought Arvind had something already worked out for the above topic. The first order of business is to retain the FA for Tamil language. The state of tamil-related articles is really deteriorating. The Pandyar article is not FA class, Cheras are even worse. Carnatic Music and Bharatanatyam are really bad. There is so much to work, but so little resources. Several experienced editors are simply tired or over worked - Sundar, Arvind, Venu62..--Aadal 20:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
You're Invited!
[edit]Wiki Raja 04:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
rollback
[edit]Hello, I have granted you rollback. Please only use it for Vandalism. Regards, John Vandenberg (chat) 11:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Signpost article
[edit]Ravi, I have reverted your changes on the Signpost article. Once the Signpost is published, typo fixing is allowed, large scale changes are not. If you would like to add something, please add them to the comments section. Thanks. — Ganeshk (talk) 01:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
SUL Merge
[edit]Can you please help me merge my SUL with ta:wikt:பயனர்:Nazar. The username has no edits but is unavailable for some reason. Thanks a lot! -- Nazar (talk) 14:25, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've sent a request at ta:பயனர்_பேச்சு:Ravidreams#SUL_Merge too. Hope you'll notice it either here or there :) -- Nazar (talk) 14:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- The Tamil Wiktionary Merge is finally Done! Thanks for all your help! :) -- Nazar (talk) 16:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
File:India-rail-1870.png
[edit]A reviewer commented that the file you've uploaded fails one or multiple criterion for the validity of this image. Can you address the reviewer's concern at the peer review page? Zuggernaut (talk) 16:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Your announcement of Hyderabad meetup on Telugu wiki
[edit]I moved your announcement to news page on village pump of Telugu wikipedia,as it is not relevant on first page. The announcement has reached mailing lists. Hope there will be a good turn out.-- Arjunaraoc (talk) 23:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Congratulations!!
[edit]Congratulations on the formation of Wikimedia India Chapter. -The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 11:40, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 08:22, Wednesday, November 27, 2024 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Talkback message from Tito Dutta
[edit]Message added 13:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Consider supporting. That guy is doing excellent work. Tito☸Dutta 13:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
[edit]Dear Ravidreams,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. Woah! Today happens to be the 10th anniversary of your first edit on the English Wikipedia.
Best regards, Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Ping
[edit]Ravi, I've emailed you on a Signpost matter. Tony (talk) 04:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Ravidreams. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Real Life Barnstar | |
Thank you Ravi for taking the lead in organizing WikiConference India 2016. I really appreciate everything that you do for the movement. Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 02:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC) |
Thanks, Satdeep Gill. This is my first barnstar outside my home wiki. So, this will remain something special :)--Ravi (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ravidreams. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions alert
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Kautilya3 (talk) 09:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hello Ravidreams, you need to watch your steps at the Karunanidhi article. You need to base your arguments on Wikipedia policies, not on your personal likes/dislikes or beliefs. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 09:03, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
DMK
[edit]Hi Arakkar Ravishankar, please revert the edit to Periyarist's latest edit, if any vandalism occurs. Though am watching closely.
Thanks. Periyarist (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:45, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ravidreams. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Ravidreams,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on and off wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages. [1]
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English). [2]
Find more information about this project. [3] Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 16:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Ravidreams,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation's annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well the Wikimedia Foundation supports your work on and off wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Candid Chat about 2021 Board of Trustee Candidature Experience
[edit](Sharing the invite here since I didn't have your email id on record. Kindly reply at csinha-ctr@wikimedia.org)
Hello Ravishankar,
I am Chitraparna Sinha, the community facilitator of SAARC for the Movement Strategy & Governance (MSG) initiative.
As you might already be aware, the 2022 Board of Trustee elections are in the offing, and we are reaching out to 2021 Board of Trustee candidates to know about their 2021 election experience. The aim is to improve the election process. Your opinion is valuable as you have first-hand experience about the process.
If you are interested to have this 1:1 discussion, kindly state your availability between 7 February and 12 February 2022. I will share the calendar invite accordingly.
We could explore the following questions as talking points:
- What worked well during the 2021 Board of Trustees election & what would you like to change?
- What do candidates need to know about the role of a Trustee?
- What would you change about the way candidates interact with the community (through meta-wiki or via regional calls)? What do you think the community question process should look like?
Thanks for your time. Looking forward to your revert.
Regards, Chitraparna Sinha CSinha (WMF) (talk) 06:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)