Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boil it down
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was userified. -- AllyUnion (talk) 07:20, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Silly poem, no encyclopedic content. (212.206.63.108's slightly messed-up nominations fixed Uncle G 16:52, 2005 Feb 11 (UTC))
- Delete and send to BJAODN. --FOo 17:54, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- It was never intended as an Encyclopaedic article. I am surprised that anyone would ever think it was. It is meant at part of a tutorial on how to write good articles for Wikipedia. Perhaps homour and some light-heartedness occasionally has no place here? Apwoolrich 19:32, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- This is an encyclopedia, not a humor magazine. It's either a copyright violation or it belongs in Wikisource. What did you expect would happen to it once you'd completed your "tutorial", and why did you think the article space was a valid place for it? Speedy deleted. RickK 22:16, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)
- It was never intended as an Encyclopaedic article. I am surprised that anyone would ever think it was. It is meant at part of a tutorial on how to write good articles for Wikipedia. Perhaps homour and some light-heartedness occasionally has no place here? Apwoolrich 19:32, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I'm all for humor, but not in the article namespace. If it's part of a tutorial, please move it to your userspace or the Wikipedia namespace. Move. Mgm|(talk) 22:06, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.