Talk:Divine simplicity

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Mid‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Religion Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of religion

Untitled

Well that just has to be wrong. How would a Catholic theologian know such a thing? Because he has a mind like mine and .... Paul Beardsell 14:59, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)

OK, well done, very much improved. Thanks, that explains it for me. Paul Beardsell 15:41, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Lead

Is there anything else that's generic enough to put in the intro? This article will never hit the Good Articles list with a single line lead. Could we also explore similarities with Tawhid in the intro and eliminate the dab link?. See WP:LEAD MrZaius^talk 14:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Secular parallels

Would links to related secular ideas be at all appropriate in this article? (This article is powerfully reminiscent of Pirsig's metaphysics of quality..) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.115.108.103 (talk) 00:20, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please! Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 05:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No context, no says-who!

The article lacks information on who proposed the hypothesis, from where it originates (prob the pagan platonism), and what christians adher to it. There are christians for everything, so there are prob also christians that dismiss the idea as a semantically designed taboo. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 05:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I misread, the article is better than that. The intro needs fixup to introduce the text properly and there are some rugged formulae that must be polished, f.ex.:

In Christian thought, God as a simple being is not divisible

I can fix such undue generalizations such as adding: "In mainstream Christian tradition". Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 05:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Infinitely simple"

!!!?? Just contemplating the weird usage of infinity! I'm glad to not be contemporary with Aquinas. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 09:34, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And

but a single entity of a oneness even more single and unique than any single thing in creation

! (ROTF! – now thank me for my opinion and dismiss me!) Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 09:50, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure what you're asking, but does this help? The Catholic Encyclopedia states: "When we say that God is infinite, we mean that He is unlimited in every kind of perfection or that every conceivable perfection belongs to Him in the highest conceivable way. In a different sense we sometimes speak, for instance, of infinite time or space, meaning thereby time of such indefinite duration or space of such indefinite extension that we cannot assign any fixed limit to one or the other. Care should be taken not to confound these two essentially different meanings of the term." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.191.87.42 (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, perhaps you should cunsult Q 11, article 4 of the Summa Theologica on this subject. It is "Whether God is supremely one?" 24.191.87.42 (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christian divine simplicity

1) Does the article mention that, like Aquinas says, "God is the same as his essence"?

2) Has divine simplicity ever been infallibly taught, in Catholicism? Whether or not it has been should be in the article, too. 24.191.87.42 (talk) 00:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC) Answer: - It has, by the IV Lateran Council(1215), Decree against Albigenses and Cathars, chapter 1 (Denzinger-Hünermann, n. 800), and the I Vatican Council (1870), Dogmatic Constitution 'Dei Filius', chapter 1 (Denzinger-Hünermann, 3001).[reply]

3) The refutation of the criticisms to (Christian) Divine simplicity made by thinkers like Plantinga, Craig and others is to be found in Francisco Suárez, S.J., 'Disputationes Metaphysicae', disputation XXX, section III (Opera omnia, ed. Vives, volume 26).

Latest edit by 67.160.161.80 doesn't make much sense except as apparent vandalism. Please justify here, if reverting. Simplicity classically teaches Divine Essence is same as existence (see 1 above). Cpsoper (talk) 08:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Divine simplicity in Jewish thought

Have added short quote from Rambam to crystallise and exemplify the 'no Divine attributes' argument, I think this helps, but happy to discuss.Cpsoper (talk) 08:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

Helpful article, but it seems appropriate to identify a primary advocate, though not progenitor of Greek thought on Simplicity, one who drew from and interacted with the Alexandrian theologians and philosophers.Cpsoper (talk) 21:28, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic thought

Simplicity has played a big part in Islamic theological discourse, it ought to be included here. I will try to supply a basic start. Cpsoper (talk) 13:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Divine simplicity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050318170731/http://www.torah.org/learning/spiritual-excellence/classes/doh-1-8.html to http://www.torah.org/learning/spiritual-excellence/classes/doh-1-8.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]