Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brick Factory

Non-topic. No potential to become a real encyclopedia article. Perhaps it could be added to an "abstractions" or "quandaries" page or something similar. --Bceaglejoe 17:02, 11 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Bceaglejoe added this to VfD and then removed it, but I agree with its addition. It's an in joke, an not a particularly good one. --Ben Brockert 22:12, May 14, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Not encyclopedic, and as you say posted as an in joke it seems. Andrewa 16:47, 15 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Before the first brick factory, people made bricks by hand. Problem solved. DopefishJustin (・∀・) 22:11, May 15, 2004 (UTC)
Delete - tries to be funny, isn't. -- Cyrius|&#9998 22:59, May 16, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Arrant nonsense. Could/should have been a speedy deletion, I think. No, NOT an abstraction or a quandary or a paradox or a riddle or a puzzle.One obviously false premises: "In the construction of a brick factory, one must use bricks." Followed by a meaningless sentence: "In the purpose of a brick factory, it must be used for the manufacturing of bricks, hence a factory which makes bricks." This is probably meant to be another false premise, namely "to obtain bricks, one must have a brick factory." No evidence that this is actually discussed on the Internet anywhere, much less on http://www.gold-team.net/forums which happens to be a 404 Not Found. Clumsy effort at promotion for the site? Dpbsmith 19:02, 18 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Delete. --bceaglejoe 06:08, 19 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]