User talk:Leonardo2505

Brian Krause

Can you cite a reference for his middle name being Thomas. You mentioned on the talk page that Charmed magazine states it as Thomas, so can use cite the reference.--NeilEvans 19:35, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm new to Wiki myself, but information on here should be verifiable. So references are meant to be given so that the info can be checked. Do you have a copy of the magazine which mentioned his middle name being Thomas. If so then you can probably cite the magazine number and relevant page number. I'm not really sure how you would cite magazine articles, as I mostly cite references from the internet.--NeilEvans 14:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Matthew Perry.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Matthew Perry.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

dawson's creek infobox

Dear Leonardo, I see you are the primary and only author of Template:Infobox Dawson's Creek episode. In a drive towards limiting the amount of episode infoboxes, i'm considering replacing your template on all pages that it is used on with the standard Template:Infobox television episode and then putting it up for deletion. I was wondering if you have any direct objections to this. TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 20:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Manchester WikiProject

Hi Leonardo2505! You have identified yourself as a user from Greater Manchester as indicated by your userpage. We are looking for dedicated and quality members of the editing community, who would be willing to join a Greater Manchester WikiProject - a kind of community action group interested in improving articles that relate to Greater Manchester.

We are hoping to have a diverse team, and would be grateful if you would be willing to register your interest at this proposal page.

Any questions, please feel free to contact me! Hope to hear from you. Jhamez84 03:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

For future reference, when you want to move a page from one name to another, please don't simply cut and paste it as you did with Sam Wilder, Patty Halliwell and Penny Halliwell. This causes all of the edit history of the page to get left behind, so we can no longer tell who's contributed to the page, or how. In most cases, you should use the "Move" tab at the top of the page to move the page (with history) to the new location. In cases where there is already a page at the new name (as with Sam and Patty in this case) that already has it's own history, you should post a request on Requested Moves to get an admin to move the page, with history, for you. I've posted all 3 of these pages there now so they should be fixed soon, but I just wanted to make you aware for any future moves you try to do. Thanks for your contributions! --Maelwys 13:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Uter.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Uter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LeoWhitelighter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LeoWhitelighter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account

Why, yes you do...if i knew you were gay, i would have been nicer and you hate bush...extra bonus!! LOL Ctjf83 21:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png

Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png

Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:24, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy names

That other fictional character articles do this is not a reason to do this in Family Guy. Generally the middle names are one-shot gags, so these don't really belong in the lede sections. "Proper" names (such as Megan) only make sense when the character is more formally known by that name, which does not make sense for this show. Lois has never been nee. Pewterschmidt in any real-world sense (including in the show's non-flashback status quo), and expressing this character's name in this fashion is in-universe.

Even if the show is consistent with name details (and the writers could choose to complicate this in any future episode), the characters' names are really those used in their article titles. There is no more proper name for a fictional character. / edg ☺ ☭ 01:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So you don't really care, huh? If you don't mind, I'll be restoring my edits. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I just thought that as nearly all other fictional characters with middle names and elongated true names are referenced at the beginning that Family Guy should be as well, my point being what seperates Family Guy from every other show? Leo (talk) 17:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My point is that articles you could cite for other shows are, in many cases, wrong. The {{Family Guy character}} template contains a space for detailed name. Using the detailed name twice at the article top says this is the character's name, even tho in many cases the detailed name is almost never used on the show, and may be partially derived from one-shot gags. The bold name in the lede section should be the name of the character, not a place for pedantic trivia. I think this should be consistent with Family Guy character articles. Articles for The Simpsons, etc., can be dealt with separately. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fictional single parents

Category:Fictional single parents, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 19:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to The Doctor's Daughter, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —TreasuryTag—t—c 09:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Join us?

Hello, Leonardo2505! Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Greater Manchester-related articles. Given the interest we're assuming you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Greater Manchester? It's a user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Greater Manchester-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. The project has in-house specialists to support and facilitate your ideas. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We hope to be working with you in the future!

--Jza84 | Talk 18:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:48, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsay Loahn listed at RfD

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lindsay Loahn. Since you had some involvement with the Lindsay Loahn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sprinfield Elementary listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sprinfield Elementary. Since you had some involvement with the Sprinfield Elementary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — This, that and the other (talk) 04:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love the userbox

Thank you for using the image of my beloved electric 12s in your userbox. The Magnetone has just been restored by Maton and I'm looking forward to our reunion. Andrewa (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Leonardo2505. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Leonardo2505. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]