Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Woodland

Tim Woodland was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

Thought it was a stub at first, but it looks like a vanity page and nonsense. Can't find any information on him on Google, and www.apple-history.com doesn't bear this out. Wiki'd page Justin McOmie doesn't exist. User:24.20.184.109 hasn't made any other significant contributions. KeithH 05:00, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Nonsense. Delete. — David Remahl 05:50, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
I smell conspiracy theory. The two Steves must've backstabbed Tim and Justin, cutting them out of the company, then covered their tracks exceptionally well. Or not. Delete, of course. • Benc • 09:16, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete: Bizarre, speedy delete candidate for patent nonsense. Unless Tim was the Stu Sutcliffe of Apple. Geogre 12:18, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Mike Markulla was the third founder of Apple Computer and provided most of the initial financial backing. Indeed (click click) our article on Apple Computer says so. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 19:17, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete but it's not patent nonsense however much we'd like it to be. Rossami 04:35, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
delet Timothy001 20:12, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete - patent nonsense - If I create an article called Rossami and claim he was the founding father of the United States that would be patent nonsense - Tεx τ urε 23:29, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.