User talk:Securiger

File:Secant ogive.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Secant ogive.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:21, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dragon Fire (novel)

The article Dragon Fire (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable per WP:BK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:03, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Image Deletion

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:05, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New section on tarring and feathering

Hi Securiger. I just added a new section ("Materials", my first Wikipedia contribution) to the article on Tarring and feathering. You had previously written a section for the Discussion page, entitled "Dubious", in which you made many of the same points I try to make. In fact, you seem to know more about the subject than I do. I thought it was unfortunate that only readers of the Discussion would learn about the important differences between pine tar and bitumen which you describe. (I may not have gotten the facts about coal tar quite right. I classed it with bitumen, while you classed it with pine tar.) Anyway, I thought you might be interested to take a look.

By the way, a link in your discussion section (American history site) was outdated. I replaced it with a link to what I believe is the same article: American history site. Jerry in San Diego (talk) 19:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Category:Early telecommunications

Category:Early telecommunications, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

M18 Claymore mine

Hi, you have made a number of contributions to the article M18 Claymore mine. I am conducting a research project on the firing system for the M18A1 and was wondering whether you would be able to help me location some information on the electrical detonation system for the CDFD cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afriend (talk • contribs) 03:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:World population increase history.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:World population increase history.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 05:52, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:World population history.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:World population history.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 05:52, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Listed as missing

Hi. You are now officially listed as missing. Should you ever return, feel free to remove your name from the list. If you do not wish to be listed, please leave a note indicating such. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Earthworks (company)

The article Earthworks (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this company passes WP:NCOMPANY. BEFORE doesn't show anything but mentions in passing/primary sources/press releases and like.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:36, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Almace

The article Almace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This phenomenon isn't covered in reliable third party sources as required by the WP:GNG. A search only shows passing mentions which aren't enough for significant coverage and Notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jontesta (talk) 23:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Almace for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Almace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almace until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jontesta (talk) 16:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]