Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fighting Terrorism
Fighting Terrorism was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 14 votes to delete. Postdlf 06:23, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
A personal essay (none too good either), inherently derivative, any loose ideas salvageable from it belong under Terrorism. — Bill 19:45, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- speedy as patent nonsense. Dunc|☺ 19:49, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- vote to delete: illegible, perhaps "patent" nonsense, clearly all POV.Sfahey 19:55, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Unpatented nonsense. Original research/essay. Geogre 00:20, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. NPOV essay. Nadavspi 00:38, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete... please, before Bush finds this page and thinks he sees some brilliant ideas. (It's funny how I started out here as an inclusionist/eventualist....) func(talk) 03:08, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Nonsense article. --*drew 03:11, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Nonsense essay. jni 10:28, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Patent nonsense and POV. Andre (talk) 13:58, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)
- Original essay, mostly patent nonsense. Delete - Mike Rosoft 12:22, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Essay. --Improv 21:31, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Rant. — Gwalla | Talk 19:42, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete this is an encyclopedia, not a free service for people who want to cheat on the political science assignment. --Cynical 20:27, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete PPGMD
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.